E-mail: Send an e-mail
E-mail: Send an e-mail
E-mail: Send an e-mail
E-mail: Send an e-mail
Introduction. The need to modernize higher education in Russia does not cause controversy, and the search for effective ways to transform higher education causes a lot of scientific discussions and disputes. Among the wide range of issues related to this topic, researchers are interested in the formation of motivations and va-lues that dominate the minds of modern teachers. The implementation of the professional potential at the university, self-development and self-identification as part of the educational environment catalyzes the process of introducing higher education reforms. Professional self-identification of the teacher, satisfaction with pedagogical activity is a determining vector both for the effective functioning of the educational organization as a whole and for overcoming various crisis situations that accompany any process of modernization.
Materials and methods. Considering the problem of the formation of motivations and values of professional self-identification of teachers of higher education, we turn to the method of sociological survey, which allows you to track changes of various kinds and nature in areas of interest in public life. The opinion of the main actors of the educational process will provide an opportunity to realize the existing realities, to find answers to questions related to the present and future of higher education. Of course, in our studies we refer to the method of analyzing the available scientific literature on the subject under study.
Results. We have analyzed quarterly polls that are devoted to identifying the attitude of teachers to a number of “annoying” factors accompanying the processes of modernization of higher education.
In 2018–2019, we conducted a survey among teachers at peda-gogical universities (South Ural State Humanitarian-Pedagogical University, Shadrinsk State Pedagogical University, Ural State Pe-dagogical University), dedicated to identifying the labor values of teachers with varying degrees of professional self-identification. A detailed description of the results obtained is presented in the article.
Discussion. Effective modernization in the educational environment, in our opinion, depends largely on the psychological attitude of the faculty and the ability to adequately respond to the changes.
Conclusion. Professional self-identity of a teacher of higher pedagogical school - teachers' identification of themselves as part of a university is the key to the effective functioning of an educational organization, recognition of its mission, corporate philosophy. Teachers are informational carriers of the culture of higher education, its values and traditions, image, not only in the period of their professional activities, but also in their previous history. Depending on how the faculty shares the values of its almamater, so much these values are shared by the public.
high school, teacher, professional self-identification, professional motivation, labor values, corporate spirit, pedagogical university
The components of professional self-identification of a higher school teacher were identified;
Effective sociological surveys were conducted, allowing to make a scientific and practical generalization on the studied aspects;
The results of surveys and practical recommendations for improving the formation of professional self-identification of teachers of higher education are presented.
The article was written in the framework of the project “Professional Pedagogical Education: Transformation of accumulated experience into a realizable perspective” included in the comprehensive program “Pedagogical Education in the Southern Urals: Scientific Basis for Development and Innovation”.
1. Babintsev V.P. (2014) Byurokratizatsiya regional'nogo vuza [Bureaucratisation of a regional university]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii. 2, 30–37. (In Russian).
2. Bizyuk A.V., Vitkalenko D.O. (2011) Metodika sozdaniya korporativnogo stilya [Methodology for creating a corporate style]. Vostochno-Yevropeyskiy zhurnal peredovykh tekhnologiy. 10 (49), 31–33. (In Russian).
3. Van Dick R. (2006) Predannost' i identifikatsiya s organizatsiyey (perevod s nemetskogo) [Devotion and identification with the organization (Translation from German)]. Khar'kov, Izdatel'stvo “Gumanitarnyy Tsentr”. P. 142 p. (In Russian).
4. Yemelyanov S.G. (2006) Integrirovannaya otsenka innovatsionnogo potentsiala vuza [Integrated assessment of the innovative potential of the university]. Innovatsii. 6, 93–98. (In Russian).
5. Krylov A.N. (2004) Korporativnaya identichnost' dlya menedzherov i marketolo-gov [Corporate Identity for Managers and Marketers]. Moscow, Izdatel'stvo IKAR. 226 p. (In Russian).
6. Kutsenko A.I., Lashkova A.I. (2011) Korporativnaya identifikatsiya biznesa: brend-buk i pasport firmennykh standartov [Corporate business identification: brand book and passport of corporate standards]. Monografiya. Novokuznetsk, Izdatel'skiy tsentr SibGIU. 262 p. (In Russian).
7. Badmaev V.N. (2015) Missiya i identichnost' universiteta [Mission and University Identity]. Vestnik Kalmytsko-go universiteta. 2 (26), 38–43. (In Russian).
8. Vishlenkova E. (2004) Simvoly Kazanskogo universiteta [Symbols of Kazan University]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii. 10, 80–88. (In Russian).
9. Skvortsova TM, Sternin I. (2007) O korporativnoy identichnosti [About corporate identity]. Upravle-niye kompaniyey. 2, 64–67. (In Russian).
10. Gordeeva D.S. (2017) Cultivating a sense of national civic identity in students at present-day humanities and pedagogy colleges as part of the process of professional prepa-ration. Espacios. 38 (56). Available at: http://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n56/17385616
.html (Accessed: 12.02.2018).
11. James E. McClellan III, Harold Dorn. (2006) Science and Technology in World History. Baltimore and London. Johns Hopkins University Press. 2, 121.
12. Demtsura S.S., Ryabchuk P.G., Gordeeva D.S. (2017) Problemy i zadachi operezhayushchego upravleniya v sfere realizatsii obrazovatel'nykh uslug [Problems and tasks of advanced management in the implementation of educational services]. Azimut nauchnykh issledo-vaniy: pedagogika i psikhologiya. 6, 2 (19), 47–51. (In Russian).
13. Krylov A.N.(2004) Korporativnaya identichnost' dlya menedzherov i marketologov (uchebnoye posobiye) [Corporate identity for managers and marketers (a training manual)]. Moscow, Izdatel'stvo IKAR. 226 p. (In Russian).
14. Rowden M. (2007) Korporativnaya identichnost' [Corporate Identity]. Moscow, Dobraya kniga. 296 p. (In Russian).
15. Badmaev V.N. (2015) Missiya i identichnost' universiteta [Mission and University Identity]. Vestnik Kalmyts-kogo universiteta. 2 (26), 38–43. (In Russian).
16. Shemyatikhina L.Yu. (2007) Rynok truda professional'nykh menedzherov v Rossii [Labor market of professional managers in Russia]. Fundamental'nyye issledovaniya.12, 134–136. (In Russian).
17. Shukshunov V.E. (2002) Innovatsionnyy potentsial vysshey shkoly Rossii [Innovative potential of higher education in Russia]. Novocherkassk, SRSTU (NPI). 4, 14. (In Russian).
18. Pimenova N.Yu. (2004) Osobennosti formirovaniya korporativnoy identichno-sti v sisteme distantsionnogo obucheniya: opyt Vladivostokskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i servisa [Features of the formation of corporate identity in the system of distance learning: the experience of the Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service]. Universitetskoye upravleniye. 5-6 (33),163–172. (In Russian).
19. Fisun A.V. (2007) Vnutrikorporativnyye kommunikatsii: problemy postroyeniya effektivnoy sistemy [Internal corporate communications: problems of building an effective system]. Upravleniye chelovecheskim potentsialom. 1, 24–35. (In Russian).